I've been thinking about this in terms of a mathematical function:
I'm sure volumes and volumes have been written about how to optimize first summation. That is, how do I efficiently manage a team, what's the ideal team size and structure, how do I identify and develop the "beta" of my people, etc. I'm interested in the second summation of the function with the "alpha" terms.
That represents the leftover time that a person has after pouring themselves into leadership/management. In other words if a person would passionately do tasks X, Y, and Z on their own is there any time left to do some of those things after they're done leading. Mathematically if 100% of a leader's time is spent managing then 1- the summation will be 0 (i.e. no left over time). On the other hand if 10% of a leaders time across all of their people is spent managing them the manager will still get to spend 90% of their time doing things that (presumably) they enjoyed doing as an individual contributor.
I want to be a participatory leader. I want to have time left. I don't want the cost of my alpha to be 1 leaving me no time/energy to do anything else. I like the creative/building process and leadership isn't worth it to me if I don't get to participate.
No comments:
Post a Comment